Skip to main content
NSDF Logo NSDF
Donate
What's On
NSDF HUB
What We Do
What We Do
What is NSDF all about?
NSDF HUB NSDF CREATES Access Toolkit How to Enter a Show Our Yearly Festival The Bigger Room Project
Support Us
Support Us
How can you support NSDF's work?
Alumni Supporters Scheme Our Supporters Make a Donation Leave a Legacy
Our Story
Our Story
Find out more about the 65 year old Festival.
Our Mission Our History Our Principles Our People Our Alumni
The Fourth Wall
The Fourth Wall
Read articles from Noises Off, our Festival Magazine, and catch the latest from Team NSDF at Blogs & News
Blogs & News Noises Off
Register
Noises Off Article

The speed of sound

Published on
30th March 2018

Nathan Dunn loves Speed Death of the Radiant Child, but he doesn't like it 

Share this article

For me, Speed Death of the Radiant Child wasn't the gold standard – and that's fine. The focus on criticism at this festival has offered up the important reminder that the easiest thing to do in this industry is to talk, and when the hardest thing to do is to create, sometimes talking can do more harm than good. But I will say this: I loved it and didn't like it. Let me explain.

The big picture, despite its frustrating elusiveness, was layered with haggardly beautiful and broad strokes. It's aesthetic strength almost faultless, the technical qualities a complete tour de force. The script is a dangerous beast that is for the most part tamed well. Scenes carry the appropriate emotional weight and know when it needs to be lifted or dropped. The ideas are big and their realisations are bigger. The characters on-stage are (almost) 100% believable, and to maintain that balance at such an intensity whilst also carrying the conceptual subtext is a feat in itself. Ben Kulvichit's conceptual prowess is difficult to question.

But questions remain. Not for him, however.

The audience reaction to Speed Death has fascinated me. I am torn. I find myself admiring the patience and trust that an audience will give to a piece that is shamelessly bold and brave. I adore the encouragingly eager-eyed approach and willingness to be taken on a journey. Yet, I am equally disappointed in the unchallenging nature of an audience who didn't have a clear grasp of what was happening before them and therefore, perhaps intimidated by this, took shelter under its guise of intellectualness. Most thought it was clever - but why? Some have offered explanations with a concise justification, but I feel there are still holes in the 'common perspective'. Beyond the intriguing script and beautiful imagery, the general consensus appears to be that strobe lighting, ambient sound and the use of the naked human body have suddenly become the new language of clever thought in theatre.

Perhaps I am naive in my assumption that not enough of us challenged a piece begging to be challenged. Perhaps I have failed to see said challenges, and simply view the world the way I want to view it. Or perhaps I haven't, and perhaps this is exactly what we have done as viewers. This piece serves as a fine example of how we can lead ourselves blindly into a blissfully ignorant appreciation of something that looks so pretty and sounds so nice, but at the core might be just as problematic as we fear it is.

We don't want to admit we're wrong as an audience. If we know a piece is trying to do something and we don't connect to that, we rarely tell ourselves we're the problem. We would much rather insist a piece we didn't connect to was bad or that we enjoyed a piece we didn't understand because it hurts much more to look within and ask ourselves the question 'why?'. We are scared of the answer, because often it tells you more about yourself than you'd care to realise.

I was forced to ask myself these questions before I could dare to ask anyone else, but it was the piece that made me do that. I sat there and felt nothing during the 110 minutes that unfolded on stage but now, lying in my bed over 24 hours later, my mind is thrillingly attached to it. I reacted similarly when last year I reviewed Kulvichit's previous NSDF entry Celebration which received heaps of praise and left me feeling lost and disconnected from the common viewpoint. Seeing him and the Warwick University Drama Society bring this work and challenge me like this has made me understand why I felt that way. It allowed me find a level to understand the work on, and opened up a gateway in my mind that I won't be able to close and nor do I wish to.

And that's why I loved a piece I didn't like.
 

@noffmag //  noff@nsdf.org.uk

Latest from Noises Off

Latest from Noises Off

See all
NSDF 2022

Powerful discomfort

14th May 2022

Nathan Hardie on the confronting NSDF Late show MANIC

Read More
NSDF 2022

To meet us here

15th April 2022

Taiwo Ava Oyebola interrogates the history and heritage of Them

Read More
NSDF 2022

Up down up down

15th April 2022

Zoe Callow gets to grips with the staging of Great Mother - Iya Ayaba

Read More

Sign-up to our newsletter

Sign-up for our newsletter
Follow us
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube
Contact Us Frequently Asked Questions Young Person Protection Policy Website Accessibility Privacy Policy
© NSDF Site by Grandad.digital
Sign-up to our newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter to stay up to date on all our upcoming events, information and news. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more about how we process your data.