Skip to main content
NSDF Logo NSDF
Donate
What's On
NSDF HUB
What We Do
What We Do
What is NSDF all about?
NSDF HUB NSDF CREATES Access Toolkit How to Enter a Show Our Yearly Festival The Bigger Room Project
Support Us
Support Us
How can you support NSDF's work?
Alumni Supporters Scheme Our Supporters Make a Donation Leave a Legacy
Our Story
Our Story
Find out more about the 65 year old Festival.
Our Mission Our History Our Principles Our People Our Alumni
The Fourth Wall
The Fourth Wall
Read articles from Noises Off, our Festival Magazine, and catch the latest from Team NSDF at Blogs & News
Blogs & News Noises Off
Register
Noises Off Article

What's with the solo?

Published on
7th April 2020

Issy Flower weighs in on the abundance of monologues on our stages and screens

Share this article

From Fleabag to Bojack, Dot Cotton to Ian McKellen, the monologue is everywhere at the moment. It’s understandable – monologues allow for close insights into character and situation that is rarely found in the hustle-and-bustle of contemporary theatre and television. They allow an audience to move into the mind of a character and share with them their private thoughts and feelings, those that are perhaps only revealed through subtext in previous encounters. However, with accusations of narcissism, plagiarism, financial ulterior motives slithering in alongside the praise, do we really want a theatre entirely populated by them?

Admittedly, the monologue provides, and has provided, an attractive prospect for writers looking to flex their muscles by fully inhabiting a character, and for theatres looking to appear supportive of this. Despite the mass of resources the National Theatre possesses, they still chose to put on a one-man show, Death of England, reflecting their commitment to top quality acting and writing as well asspectacle which recent shows, such as The Ocean at the End of the Lane, have demonstrated. Death of England allowed the audience to get inside the mind of a man who feels disenfranchised in his own country, a thrilling move when the Brexit divide has chucked these issues to the top of the mile, and so the monologue allowed the theatre to explore themes and values that can be lost in an increasingly digital and technical theatrical world, even if that means using some of the theatre’s fund in something that might lose money.

However, there’s a thin line between this and just putting on a vanity exercise. Ian McKellen’s recent tour combined interviews and anecdotes with speeches ripped from their original contexts and used as trophies. Surely it’s enough for McKellen to demonstrate a lifetime of theatrical skill without presenting tired-out monologues to an audience that’s more hungry for stories about Peter Jackson than Henry VIII. Shakespeare wrote monologues for a reason: to connect his characters with the audience and reveal their inner workings. The reason was not a victory lap around regional theatres, no matter how laudable that aim might be. 

Similarly, the preponderance of female-led monologues seems to be a blessing and a curse. This can be attributed to the incredible success of shows such as Chewing Gum and Fleabag, which started as short fringe pieces and catapulted their writers to stardom through the clever mix of taboo topics and recognisable situations. It’s difficult not to like the witty voices of Phoebe Waller-Bridge and Michaela Coel, who speak to young British women in a way that a lot of art has struggled to before, and watching it as a teenager I really connected with the trials and tribulations of their lives. However, as the Royal Mile from last year's Fringe can attest, everyone seems to have jumped on the bandwagon. You cannot move in small-scale theatre for one or two-woman shows discussing periods, mid-life crises and sex stories, in a way that is meant to be shocking but can’t do anything but become wearing. Of course we want these stories to be told, without them there’d be a distinct lack of freshness and flair, but there are ways to tell them that don’t copy Phoebe Waller-Bridge. 

If you look at the sources, film, television and theatre have been delivering both epic largescale work – like the recent Marvel CGI-fests – and monologue shows, for decades upon decades. Shakespeare was attempting to deliver battle-based spectacle in the 1590s, and BBC and ITV were producing weekly plays and serials at the same time they were importing The Incredible Hulk. The sudden jump in monologue based shows receiving awards is only an indication of the current trends. These shows have always been here, have always been well written and acted, and their visibility is only due to fad.

The real question is whether we really want this fad to continue. True, we have gained some incredible pieces of television, film and theatre from it—but what we’ve got alongside them is as a dull market saturated with monologues all saying the same thing or drenched in vanity, put on to lower costs or to challenge the predominance of the blockbuster. The monologue may be here to stay—but I for one would like to put it in the rubbish.

@noffmag / noff@nsdf.org.uk

Latest from Noises Off

Latest from Noises Off

See all
NSDF 2022

Powerful discomfort

14th May 2022

Nathan Hardie on the confronting NSDF Late show MANIC

Read More
NSDF 2022

To meet us here

15th April 2022

Taiwo Ava Oyebola interrogates the history and heritage of Them

Read More
NSDF 2022

Up down up down

15th April 2022

Zoe Callow gets to grips with the staging of Great Mother - Iya Ayaba

Read More

Sign-up to our newsletter

Sign-up for our newsletter
Follow us
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube
Contact Us Frequently Asked Questions Young Person Protection Policy Website Accessibility Privacy Policy
© NSDF Site by Grandad.digital
Sign-up to our newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter to stay up to date on all our upcoming events, information and news. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more about how we process your data.